Madi Nolan:Lama Liar
This second article contains information about Madi Nolan.
The topic is a good one with lots of curves and twists: how to find and recognize a genuine teacher?
Used to be anyone wearing a simple red string around their neck created instant recognition with anyone else wearing the same. It was a kind of brotherhood.
This was in the time when teachers were so rare, only a few individuals outside of India would ever be wearing such a string. The string meant you had attended Wong.
Now, with Madi Nolan putting strings on people's toes so they can lose weight, or tying red string around their waist so they will find their soul mates, red strings abound.
The knot they create is large, but easily undone.
A valid teacher will speak to questions about where he or she gained their knowledge. Just as in the western cultures, people who have legitimately "graduated" from eastern schools of learning can respond to who their teacher was and where their school is located.
Flee from anyone who cloaks such information in a secret cloud of nameless monasteries and foggy elders.
Question the teacher also on their own background. Some teachers I know for example have children, whom they have abandoned in order to seek the "higher" paths.
I have never been able to understand how if you abandon your own child you are in a position of authority to help others. Just defies this girl's sense of common sense!
And these teachers carefully avoid letting it be known they have offspring. Instead they want to discuss the "higher" aspects of life.
That's a split in their consciousness. Recognize it for what it is and move on!
I'll be tapping more about this topic in weeks to come but for now go to strippingtheguru.com or
americanbuddha.com for more on who is a false teacher in the North American scene.
Enjoy your day!




Buddha: Dead Beat Dad
Yes. The Buddha by all accounts did leave his wife and child behind in his search for "higher" meaning.
The Buddha was a "Dead Beat Dad" with the exception that he left his dearest ones in the lap of considerable luxury. His physical presence was the one thing lacking.
Now, if we perceive metaphorically and consider the times the story took place in, all things to do with the human flesh, the body (read feminine) were considered by seekers (read men)to be an impediment.
As in Christianity with St. Paul's admonition against the flesh, Buddhism also denounced the "things of this world".
Some scholars choose to believe the Buddha leaving his wife and child is somehow "different" than any other man leaving to go oh, say for a pack of cigarettes, back in two or three decades, dear.
These pundits feel Buddha's actions were justified by the attainment of enlightenment.
Of course that leaves the door open for men and women to justify deserting their children, emotionally and financially for the sake of some "Higher Path."
Personally I know of several people who have done just this, and who teach Buddha Dharma!
Well, that is what they claim to do. It is a case of talking the talk and not walking the walk. However because students remain eager to believe and unwilling to question, these flimsy cardboard characters get to parade as teachers, while maintaining no real practice of loving kindness to their immediate families.
Shows how easy it is to distort the teachings.
Leave the wife and kids behind?
According to the stories I've heard did not Buddha himself leave his wife and new-born child behind as he sneaked away on a quest seeking "higher" paths?